Department for International Development

Tackling Violence Against Women and Girls Overseas

Baroness Verma: I would like to take this opportunity to update the House on my work as Ministerial Champion for Tackling Violence Against Women and Girls Overseas, following my appointment in December.It has been an extremely busy period and the UK Government has continued to do a significant amount of work to protect and extend women and girls’ rights globally, including on violence against women and girls.Following my appointment I have conducted a consultation on the activities for the Ministerial Champion role, to ensure that my approach within my high level objectives is the most effective, and is informed by what people here in the UK would like me to be doing. I have consulted with civil society organisations and academics, youth activists and grassroots women’s rights organisations (both in the UK and overseas), and the previous Ministerial Champion. I also conducted a live chat via the Guardian website. I had my final roundtable yesterday - co-hosted with my Ministerial colleague from the Home Office, the Minister for Preventing Abuse, Exploitation and Crime (Karen Bradley) – hearing from organisations working on violence in the UK. I will share the consultation findings and my next steps soon.Last month I represented the UK on violence against women and girls at the UN Commission on the Status of Women (CSW), the largest global policymaking mechanism on women and girls’ rights. I came away feeling extremely proud of the UK’s leadership on violence against women and girls, including our on-going and significant investments in programming to reach the most marginalised girls and women. We can all be proud of the contribution we are making to preventing and responding to violence in some of the most difficult places to be a girl or a woman – be they living in extreme poverty, conflict or protracted crisis.At CSW, the Secretary of State for International Development’s leadership on the UN High Level Panel on women’s economic empowerment was warmly welcomed on the international stage, and the UK was vocal on how violence acts as a critical barrier to women’s economic empowerment. I co-hosted a side event with Brazil and Mozambique where I was particularly vocal on the need for new forms of partnerships to tackle violence. I also gave keynote speeches on the importance of tackling violence against older women and disabled women and girls. Leaving no one behind, including by ensuring we reach the most vulnerable and marginalised, remains a top priority for DFID’s Ministerial team.Crucially, the UK negotiated hard for good language on women and girls’ rights, including living free from violence, in the international Agreed Conclusions. These act as soft law and civil society representatives from across the world spoke passionately about the importance of the language for setting global norms on what Member States need to do to protect and progress women and girls’ rights.We also had a large range of activities across Government on International Women’s Day earlier in March. In my capacity as Ministerial Champion on Violence Against Women and Girls, I spoke alongside Ministers at the FCO and MOD on the importance of addressing violence as part of our work on women, peace and security. I also spoke at the Women of the World Festival on how violence and gender-based discrimination drive poverty, and how collectively we can work together, engaging women and girls and men and boys, to provide platforms for the most vulnerable. The Cross-Government Strategy on Violence Against Women and Girls was also published, demonstrating the ongoing leadership of Ministerial colleagues at the Home Office, and the links between efforts domestically and internationally to end violence.The priorities for me now include acting upon the series of important recommendations coming out of the consultation that I have just completed. I will be undertaking a series of visits to developing countries working to address this issue, looking to support efforts – particularly where rates of violence are extremely high – and to learn where innovative approaches are seeing dramatic reductions in violence. The UK has some way to go before we see our international goal of eradicating violence fully achieved too, and I see a critical part of my role as drawing together the best evidence from experts tackling this. Thank you to all of the Ministerial colleagues and parliamentarians working alongside me on this critical agenda.


This statement has also been made in the House of Commons: 
HCWS707

Home Office

Justice and Home Affairs post-Council statement

Lord Keen of Elie: My rt hon Friend the Secretary of State for the Home Department (Theresa May) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement:A meeting of the Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) Council was held on 21 April. My Rt. Hon Friend, the Immigration Minister, and I attended on behalf of the UK. The Council began with an adoption of the A Items, including the formal adoption of the Passenger Name Records (PNR) Directive, which the Government welcomes. I have always been clear of the importance of PNR and strongly believe that this Directive will enable all members of the European Union to work even closer together to tackle terrorist threats. The Commission then presented its Smart Borders proposals and Communication on ‘Stronger and Smarter Information Systems for Borders and Security’. On Smart Borders, the Council agreed to work towards achieving political agreement by the end of the year. Given that the UK does not participate in the borders aspects of Schengen, we will not take part in these measures. On the Information Systems Communication, the focus was on improving interoperability of data systems. The majority of Member States agreed with the position I set out, prioritising improving data quality in existing systems and ensuring that appropriate data sets could be easily ‘washed’ against each other. I also emphasised the need to further strengthen co-operation between Member States on two important areas: : first, non-Schengen States, including the UK, need to able fully to share important removal and entry ban data with Schengen States; second, the need for more proactive and systematic sharing of criminal records data of people convicted of offences relating to terrorism and serious organised crime. Member States also agreed on the need to ensure the right quantity and quality of information is provided to EU systems, such as the Second Generation Schengen Information System – SISII. I supported these calls, while noting that provision of this information remained a matter for Member States. The Presidency reiterated the importance of the political commitment to data sharing and concluded that the next step would be the development of a ‘Roadmap’ on improving information sharing, which it intended to present for adoption to the June JHA Council. The Commission then introduced its Communication on Security. The Commission stressed that this would not in any way affect Member States competence for security matters and highlighted the need for effective implementation of existing initiatives, including on tackling Firearms, and for better data sharing and threat analysis. I welcomed the focus on making better progress on practical initiatives and underlined that responsibility for national security lies solely with Member States. Over lunch, Ministers discussed the Commission Communication on the reform of the Common European Asylum System, in particular options for changes to the Dublin system. There was considerable opposition to any radical change to the Dublin system and no consensus on the preferred option for change. Views amongst Member States were diverse and several opposed relocation being a part of any new system. The Immigration Minister set out the UK’s clear view that the existing principles of the Dublin system should be retained and shared the concerns of many others about relocation: any crisis relocation mechanism must be kept separate from the existing Dublin system. The Government does not support relocation as it is the wrong response to the migratory pressures the EU faces. It undermines the important principle that asylum should be claimed in the first safe country and does not address the causes of illegal migration. After lunch, there was a progress report on the proposed European Border and Coast Guard Agency. Given the UK’s position in relation to Schengen we will not participate in this measure. However, we support the efforts by Member States to improve management of the external border of the EU. The Presidency would now open ‘triologue’ negotiations with the European Parliament and reaffirmed its intention to reach agreement with the Parliament by June, in line with the deadline set by the European Council. Discussion then turned to EU-Turkey migration. The Presidency reaffirmed the need to speed up the implementation of the EU-Turkey Agreement of 18 March. The Commission stressed that they were working on securing guarantees for non-Syrians returned to Turkey. A number of Members States stressed the need for strong security checks on individuals coming to the EU. Frontex highlighted its role in returning 325 irregular migrants from Greece to Turkey on 4 and 8 April. The European Asylum Support Office (EASO) reiterated the request for longer deployments and stated that they needed 50 or 60 people to facilitate relocation from Greece and Italy. The Immigration Minister announced a new package of support for Greece, in particular 75 personnel ready to be deployed. The UK would also launch a new scheme to resettle children at risk from the Middle East and North Africa. Several hundred would be resettled in the first year with a view to resettling up to 3,000 by the end of the Parliament. The Immigration Minister set out that making the EU -Turkey deal work was vital and the inadmissibility procedures needed to be applied appropriately to avoid undermining the agreed approach. The EU needed to ensure that it was possible to return all nationalities to Turkey. Helping to develop the Turkish asylum system was also a top priority. The Presidency concluded that there was agreement to increase the quantity and quality of pledges to EASO and Frontex, and that attention would need to be given to the possibility that migratory routes may shift, especially towards the Central Mediterranean.


This statement has also been made in the House of Commons: 
HCWS708

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Foreign Affairs Council and Foreign Affairs Council (Defence): 18–19 April 2016

Baroness Anelay of St Johns: My Right Honourable Friend, Minister for Europe (David Lidington), has made the following written Ministerial statement:My Right Honourable Friend the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and I attended the Foreign Affairs Council on 18 April and My Right Honourable Friend the Secretary of State for Defence attended the Foreign Affairs Council (Defence) on 19 April. The Foreign Affairs Council and Foreign Affairs Council (Defence) were both chaired by the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Federica Mogherini. The meetings were held in Luxembourg.Foreign Affairs CouncilA provisional report of the meeting and Conclusions adopted can be found at:http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/fac/2016/04/18-19/IranMs Mogherini briefed the Council on her recent visit to Iran. The context for this visit was the lifting of EU nuclear-related economic and financial sanctions against Iran in the wake of Iran’s implementation of measures set out in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. Ms Mogherini and a number of EU Commissioners who also participated in the visit explored the possibilities for future co-operation between the EU and Iran in a number of areas. In addition to areas for economic co-operation they also announced the intention to establish EU-Iran political and human rights dialogues. A joint statement by Ms Mogherini and the Iranian Foreign Minister, Javad Zarif, can be found at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_STATEMENT-16-1441_en.htmColombiaThe Colombian Government’s High Commissioner for Peace, Sergio Jaramillo Caro, briefed Ministers on the Colombian Peace Process, prompting a discussion on transitional justice. The risk of organised crime groups stepping into any power vacuum and the importance of a joined-up approach within the Colombian system was highlighted. The EU Commission confirmed continued support to the process through initiatives on local justice, education and demining. I offered strong support for the Peace Process, and underlined that we would be happy to share the UK experience of peace building. Mr Jaramillo confirmed that the Government of Colombia remained committed to a popular referendum on the agreement.EU External MigrationMinisters discussed the external aspects of the migration crisis, and the need for the European Union to maintain focus on both the Aegean and the Central Mediterranean migration routes. The importance of full implementation of the EU-Turkey Agreement on migration, concluded at the European Council on 17-18 March 2016, was noted; as was the ongoing work to tackle irregular migration from Africa to Europe, including through the Action Plan agreed at the Valletta Summit on migration on 11-12 November 2015.Lunch with UN High Commissioner for RefugeesOver lunch, Ministers exchanged views with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Mr Filippo Grandi, on global challenges posed by mass migration, and on implementation of the EU-Turkey Agreement on migration.Eastern PartnershipMinisters exchanged views on recent developments in the six Eastern Partnership countries and on preparations for the forthcoming EU-Eastern Partnership Ministerial Meeting on 23 May.Topics discussed included reform programmes in Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova, and the work of the Minsk Group Co-Chairs and the OSCE Chair-in Office to de-escalate the recent violent clashes between Armenia and Azerbaijan in Nagorno-Karabakh.EU Iraq/Syria/Daesh strategyMinisters agreed to Ms Mogherini’s proposal to discuss counter-Daesh at the May Foreign Affairs Council and to agree Council Conclusions. This would complement a planned discussion on Syria. In response to my call for a detailed assessment of progress, Ms Mogherini also agreed to task the EEAS and Commission to produce an assessment of implementation of the EU's Syria/Iraq/Daesh Strategy to help prepare for next month’s discussion.LibyaThe EU welcomed the arrival of the Presidency Council in Tripoli on 30 March, and expressed its support for the Libyan Political Agreement which considers the Government of National Accord (GNA) as the sole legitimate government in Libya. The EU reiterated that it has a package of immediate support totalling €100 million to the GNA, making clear that areas of support will be defined and prioritised in close co-ordination with the GNA and the UN. Council Conclusions on Libya made reference to a possible civilian CSDP mission to support the Libyan security sector, and consideration of enhanced support that could be provided through EU Operation Sophia, for example through potential capacity building for the Libyan coastguard.Ministers agreed without discussion a number of measures:The Council approved the agenda of the 41st session of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States (ACP) – EU Council of Ministers, which will take place in Dakar (Senegal) on 28 – 29 April 2016.The Council adopted a decision extending the mandate of Fernando Gentilini as the European Union Special Representative for the Middle East Peace Process until 28 February 2017.The Council adopted a decision extending the mandate of Peter Burian as the European Union Special Representative for Central Asia until 28 February 2017.The Council adopted a decision extending by 24 months, as of 31 January 2016, the validity of national permits for entry and stay granted by member states for the temporary reception of certain Palestinians.The Council adopted a decision supplementing the statement of reasons for its restrictive measures against Bank Saderat Iran.Foreign Affairs Council (Defence)Countering Hybrid ThreatsThe Council adopted conclusions, welcoming the publication of the Joint Communication on Countering Hybrid Threats, underlining the need to mobilise EU instruments to prevent and counter hybrid threats to the EU, its member states and partners, such as NATO. EU-NATO cooperation was highlighted as essential, with EU tools well placed to complement those of NATO to support Member States and Allies. Member States will reflect on the document further before considering next steps, including implementation.Central African RepublicThe Council adopted conclusions that approved the establishment of a new military training mission in the Central African Republic (EUTM RCA), to contribute to the country's defence sector reform as led by the UN. The mission, based in Bangui has a mandate of two years. EUTM RCA will build on the work of the EU military advisory mission (EUMAM RCA), working towards a modernised, effective and democratically accountable Central African Armed Forces.Capacity building in support of security and development The Council discussed the EU's efforts to find options for funding instruments for capacity building in support of security and development in order to enable partner countries and regional organisations to prevent and manage crises themselves. Defence Ministers noted that a public consultation was currently underway on the wider initiative. The European Commission also detailed progress towards a Security Sector Reform framework, the adoption of which was anticipated in mid-2016.EDA Steering BoardDefence Ministers also met in EDA Steering Board format. Ministers were updated on the implementation of key taskings and next steps, which included: the policy framework for defence cooperation; hybrid threats; Preparatory Action for Common Security and Defence Policy-related research; and the European Commission’s upcoming European Defence Action Plan.


This statement has also been made in the House of Commons: 
HCWS706